- Visibility 77 Views
- Downloads 11 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijashnb.2021.026
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Epidemiology of surgically managed traumatic brain injury patients
- Author Details:
-
Bhavuk Kapoor
-
Mayank Kapoor
-
Parul Vaid *
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) constitutes a major health and socioeconomic problem throughout the world.[1], [2] It is prevalent in both low and high-income countries and affects people of all ages. TBI is called the ‘silent epidemic’ because problems resulting from TBI are often not immediately visible and TBI patients are not very vociferous. The term ‘silent’ further reflects the common underestimation of the actual incidence and that society is often unaware of the impact of TBI.[3] Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been one of the leading causes of morbidity, disability and mortality across all ages (Bruns and Hauser, 2003; Dewan et al., 2018).[4], [5] Globally, more than 50 million individuals suffer from TBIs each year (Maas et al., 2017).[6] As of 2005, approximately 3.17 million TBI survivors experience post-traumatic complications ranging from neurological, psychosocial problems to long-term disability (Zaloshnja et al., 2008; Bazarian et al., 2009).[7], [8]
Damages of neuronal tissues associated with TBI fall into two categories: (i) primary injury, which is directly caused by mechanical forces during the initial insult; and (ii) secondary injury, which refers to further tissue and cellular damages following primary insult. Primary Brain Injuries The immediate impact of different mechanical insults to the brain can cause two types of primary injuries: focal and diffuse brain injuries.
Studies have demonstrated that the co-existence of both types of injuries is common in patients who suffered from moderate to severe TBI (Skandsen et al., 2010).[9] Studies have demonstrated that as a consequence of lacerations, compression and concussion forces, closed head TBI and penetrating TBI exhibit focal brain damage with evidence of skull fracture and localized contusion at the core of injury site (coup; Schmidt et al., 2004).[10] Necrotic area of neuronal and glial cells is concentrated at the coup with compromised blood supply causing the occurrence of hematoma - epidural, subdural and intracerebral hemorrhages at confined layers of the brain. Secondary contusion may develop in tissues opposite to or surrounding the coup (contre-coup) due to secondary impact when the brain rebounds and strikes the skull (Schmidt et al., 2004).[10]
Depending on the severity of the injury, it can lead to cognitive deficits, behavioural changes and hemiparesis. In contrast to focal injury, the main mechanism of diffuse brain injury is non-contact forces of rapid deceleration and acceleration which cause shearing and stretching injury in cerebral brain tissues.
Epidemiological studies of TBI are essential to the targeted prevention and effective treatment of brain-injured patients. ‘Traumatic brain injury’ has replaced the former term ‘head injury’ as it better captures the importance of the ‘brain’.[11]
TBI was recently defined as: ‘An alteration in brain function, or other evidence of brain pathology, caused by an external force’.[12] Tagliaferri et al.,[13] conducted a systematic review on the epidemiology of TBI in Europe in 2006. In their review they analysed 23 studies published between 1980 and 2003.
An aggregated (i.e. fatal plus hospitalised) incidence rate of 235 cases per 100,000 people per year, an average mortality rate of 15 per 100,000 people per year and a case fatality rate of 2.7% were calculated.
In the past decade, new insights into the epidemiology of TBI have emerged. Epidemiological patterns appear to be changing with an increasing incidence of TBI in the elderly. Various reports claim that mortality in TBI is decreasing.[14] The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a contemporary overview of epidemiology of TBI Patients.
Materials and Methods
Surgically managed patients of traumatic brain injuries were included in this study.
Inclusion criteria
Patient of traumatic brain injuries requiring surgical management
Patients admitted were thoroughly analysed.
Patient demographic features, type of traumatic brain injury sustained and the surgical management instituted were analysed.
Detailed statistical analysis of collected data was done.
Observations
Age groups (years) |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
0 - 19.9 |
19 |
23.8 |
20 - 39.9 |
27 |
33.8 |
40 - 59.9 |
20 |
25 |
60 - 79.9 |
13 |
16.2 |
80 - 99.9 |
1 |
1.2 |
Sex |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
Male |
64 |
80 |
Female |
16 |
20 |
Etiology |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
Fall |
46 |
57.5 |
RTA |
34 |
42.5 |
Type of TBI |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
Acute SDH |
11 |
13.75 |
ICH |
1 |
1.25 |
Contusions |
11 |
13.75 |
Chronic SDH |
20 |
25 |
EDH |
40 |
50 |
Depressed fracture |
5 |
6.25 |

Discussion
Mean age was 35.9 years in our study indicating that traumatic brain injuries are more common in younger age groups. Styrke et al.(2007)[15] reported a mean age of 22 years, while Mauritz et al. (2008)[16] reported a mean age of 49 years.
Males were more commonly (80%) involved than females (20%) in our study. This finding is seen in most of the studies.[16], [17]
In our study in 57.5% of cases, falls were responsible for TBI and in 42.5% of cases, Road traffic accidents were responsible. So, falls were more common cause of traumatic brain injuries in our study. Also falls were more commonly seen in old age and in childrens, with RTA being more common in young adults. In a study by Andelic et al, falls (51%)[18] were the most common cause of TBI. Similar findings were seen in studies by, Numminen (58.4%),[17] Heskestad et al.(51%),[19] Shivaji et al(47%)[20] and Rickels et al. (2010) (52.5%).[21]
Edh was the most common type of TBI in our study (50%). Chronic SDH occurred in 25% of cases. Acute SDH and Contusions were both seen in 13.75% of cases. Depressed fractures occurred in 6.25% of cases and ICH occurred in 1.25% of cases.
Craniotomy was the most common (42%) surgical procedure performed in our study, followed by burrhole drainage (22.5%). Decompressive craniectomy was done in 18.75% of cases and elevation of depressed fracture was performed in 6.25% of cases in our study.
Craniotomy was done for evacuation EDH in all the cases of EDH. AS indicated in another study craniotomy does provide more complete hematoma evacuation.[22] In our study, decompressive craniectomies were done in acute SDH, ICH and Contusions cases having mass effect and midline shift and clinical deterioration.
Conclusion
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) constitutes a major health and socioeconomic problem throughout the world.
It is prevalent in both low- and high-income countries
People of all ages are affected by it.
Males are more commonly involved as compared to females.
Timely hospitalisation and surgical management whenever indicated improves the survival.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Source of Funding
None.
References
- T B Cole. Global road safety crisis remedy sought: 1.2 million killed, 50 million injured annually. JAMA 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- J Ghajar. Traumatic brain injury. Lancet 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- S Koskinen, H Alaranta. Traumatic brain injury in Finland 1991-2005: a nationwide register study of hospitalized and fatal TBI. Brain Inj 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- J Bruns Jr, W Allen Hauser. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review. 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- M C Dewan, A Rattani, S Gupta, R E Baticulon, Y C Hung, M Punchak. Estimating The Global Incidence Of Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurosurg 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- J Bruns Jr, W Allen Hauser. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review. Lancet Neurol 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- E Zaloshnja, T Miller, J A Langlois, A W Selassie. Prevalence of long-term disability from traumatic brain injury in the civilian population of the United States, 2005. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- T Skandsen, K A Kvistad, O Solheim, I H Strand, M Folvik, A Vik. Prevalence and impact of diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate and severe head injury: a cohort study of early magnetic resonance imaging findings and 1-year outcome. J Neurosurg 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- O I Schmidt, M Infanger, C E Heyde. The Role of Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury. Eur J Trauma 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- J J Bazarian, I Cernak, L Noble-Haeusslein, S Potolicchio, N Temkin. Long-term neurologic outcomes after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- B Roozenbeek, A I R Maas, D K Menon. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- D K Menon, K Schwab, D W Wright, A I Maas. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- F Tagliaferri, C Compagnone, M Korsic, F Servadei, J Kraus. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- L M Gerber, Y L Chiu, N Carney, R Härtl, J Ghajar. Marked reduction in mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- J Styrke, B M Stålnacke, P Sojka, U Björnstig. Traumatic brain injuries in a well-defined population: epidemiological aspects and severity. J Neurotrauma 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- W Mauritz, I Wilbacher, M Majdan, J Leitgeb, I Janciak, A Brazinova. Epidemiology, treatment and outcome of patients after severe traumatic brain injury in European regions with different economic status. Eur J Public Health 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- H J Numminen. The incidence of traumatic brain injury in an adult population--how to classify mild cases?. Eur J Neurol 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- N Andelic, S Sigurdardottir, C Brunborg, C Roe. Incidence of hospital-treated traumatic brain injury in the Oslo population. Neuroepidemiology 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- B Heskestad, R Baardsen, E Helseth, B Romner, K Waterloo, T Ingebrigtsen. Incidence of hospital referred head injuries in Norway: A population based survey from the Stavanger region. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- T Shivaji, A Lee, N Dougall, T McMillan, C Stark. The epidemiology of hospital treated traumatic brain injury in Scotland. BMC Neurol 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- E Rickels, K von Wild, P Wenzlaff. Head injury in Germany: A population-based prospective study on epidemiology, causes, treatment and outcome of all degrees of head-injury severity in two distinct areas. Brain Inj 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- M Ross Bullock, R Chesnut, J Ghajar, D Gordon, R Hartl, D W Newell. Surgical management of acute epidural hematomas. Neurosurgery 2006. [Google Scholar]
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Kapoor B, Kapoor M, Vaid P. Epidemiology of surgically managed traumatic brain injury patients [Internet]. IP Indian J Anat Surg Head Neck Brain. 2021 [cited 2025 Sep 10];7(4):99-102. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijashnb.2021.026
APA
Kapoor, B., Kapoor, M., Vaid, P. (2021). Epidemiology of surgically managed traumatic brain injury patients. IP Indian J Anat Surg Head Neck Brain, 7(4), 99-102. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijashnb.2021.026
MLA
Kapoor, Bhavuk, Kapoor, Mayank, Vaid, Parul. "Epidemiology of surgically managed traumatic brain injury patients." IP Indian J Anat Surg Head Neck Brain, vol. 7, no. 4, 2021, pp. 99-102. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijashnb.2021.026
Chicago
Kapoor, B., Kapoor, M., Vaid, P.. "Epidemiology of surgically managed traumatic brain injury patients." IP Indian J Anat Surg Head Neck Brain 7, no. 4 (2021): 99-102. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijashnb.2021.026