IP Indian Journal of Anatomy and Surgery of Head, Neck and Brain

Print ISSN: 2581-5210

Online ISSN: 2581-5229

CODEN : IIJAAL

IP Indian Journal of Anatomy and Surgery of Head, Neck and Brain (IJASHNB) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 199

PDF Downloaded: 114


Get Permission Mitra and Kurian: Surgical excision of sublingual gland ranula - An ambiguous treatment modality?


Introduction

Ranula are one of the commonest benign salivary gland tumours which occurs due to mucous extravasation; sublingual salivary gland being the most common among all. It is a type of mucocele which mostly presents itself as a cystic mass in the floor of the mouth. Ranulas are divided into oral and plunging (cervical) ranula based on its extension.1 Hippocrates initially described ranula as a chronic inflammatory process. Suzanne and von Hippel described the origin of ranula from the sublingual gland. However, Bhaskar et al. in 1956 concluded that ranulas are produced by extravasation of saliva from damaged salivary ducts and are lined by connective tissue without epithelium. Ranulas are considered a type of pseudocyst since they are lined by granulation tissue instead of epithelium. 2, 3

There are various treatment modalities for treatment of ranula which can be divided into surgical and non-surgical. The minimally invasive non-surgical line of treatment includes sclerotherapy using intra lesional injection of sclerosing agents such as dehydrated alcohol or OK-432. According to literature, the success rate of sclerotherapy is <90%. The other conservative line of treatment includes cryotherapy, laser ablation and electrocautery. The other surgical line of treatment includes conservative management using marsupialization or surgical excision along with micro marsupialization. The radical surgical procedures include surgical excision of ranula with removal of sub lingual or submandibular salivary gland.4 An online survey conducted by Patel et al. among 220 members of the American Head and Neck Society found that the most preferred approach to treat oral ranula includes sublingual gland excision along with pseudocyst (32%), followed by marsupialization (30%), and ranula excision alone (25%). 5

This is a case presentation in a patient with oral ranula in the left sublingual gland crossing the midline without any previous history of trauma.

Diagnostic examination

There is no specific diagnostic test for Ranula which presents itself as a cystic fluctuant lesion. The higher salivary amylase and protein content of the fluid in ranula than serum suggests that ranula originates from the sublingual salivary gland which has higher mucin content. Ultrasonography is generally inconclusive due to its location. Computed Tomography (CT) scan helps to identify the anatomical extension of ranula. The sublingual gland can be examined most effectively through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Ranula's characteristic pattern on MRI scan is primarily due to its increased fluid content, which results in a low T1-weighted intermediate proton density and high T2-weighted signal intensity. In this clinical case (Figure 1), MRI reported well defined cystic lesion in left sublingual space with hypo intensity in T1W image and hyper intensity on T2W image, with an approximate measurement of 43*26*33mm (AP* ML*CC).6 The MRI image also showed extension to the mylohyoid muscle laterally, genioglossus and geniohyoid muscle medially and inferiorly till the ipsilateral submandibular space. Takimoto proposed a radiographic technique to assess the type of ranula prior to surgery, which entails application of 0.5 ml radiopaque medium into the sublingual space. 7

Figure 1

MRI depicts well defined cystic lesion in left sublingual space

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/384efbe9-22b3-4cfa-b5fb-afafcfcca2adimage1.png

Case Report

A 23 year female patient reported to the Department Of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery in SDM Dental College and Hospital, Dharwad with a chief complaint of swelling in the left side floor of mouth since 2 months. There was no associated history of trauma. The swelling was gradually increasing in nature, fluctuant, compressible, non reducible, with a positive transillumination test and crossing the midline. There was no extension of swelling in the cervical region. The swelling was not associated with pain but was associated with restricted tongue movements. There was no associated pus discharge or sinus opening.

Figure 2

Intra oral picture of left sublingual gland ranula crossing the midline

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/384efbe9-22b3-4cfa-b5fb-afafcfcca2adimage2.jpeg

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to know the extensions of the swelling and to rule out any vascular malformations.

The surgical treatment was planned as complete surgical excision of ranula along with removal of sublingual gland. During the surgical procedure, incision was given over predicted path of submandibular duct on the lesion resting over the floor of mouth. Blunt dissection was done in the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior margins to separate the mucosal epithelium from ranula. The lingual nerve and submandibular duct were identified and preserved. Primary closure was achieved by removing the ranula and its associated sublingual gland and duct.

Figure 3

Incision placed over the lesion along the predicted path of submandibular duct

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/384efbe9-22b3-4cfa-b5fb-afafcfcca2adimage3.jpeg
Figure 4

Retraction of lingual nerve and submandibular duct

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/384efbe9-22b3-4cfa-b5fb-afafcfcca2adimage4.jpeg
Figure 5

Excision of ranula along with the associated sublingual gland

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/384efbe9-22b3-4cfa-b5fb-afafcfcca2adimage5.jpeg

Histopathological examination

A histopathological analysis of the ranula reveals a cystic space in the centre that is filled with mucin and a pseudo cystic wall that is composed of loose, vascularized connective tissues. The pseudocyst wall is dominated by histiocytes, but they eventually become less prominent. An important histological feature is the absence of epithelial tissues in the wall of ranula.

Figure 6

Histopathological picture depicts loose connective tissue with abundant histiocytes and absence of epithelium

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/384efbe9-22b3-4cfa-b5fb-afafcfcca2adimage6.png

Discussion

The term “Ranula” comes from the Latin terminology, which means toad. About 0.2% per 1000 persons have ranula, which accounts for 6% of all oral sialo cysts. Only 1% to 10% of the ranulas are true retention cysts. Ranula usually occurs in children and young adults. Ranula is most common in the second decade of life with a male to female ratio of 2:1.6 Based on the location, ranula can be divided as sublingual, sublingual-submandibular and sub mandibular. Sublingual ranula is characterized by pseudocysts that are caused by mucus extravasation or retention on the floor of the oral cavity. The sublingual-submandibular and submandibular ranula groups represent the plunging of the ranula, which occurs due to the herniation of mucus content through the mylohyoid muscle. The ranula presents itself as painless, fluctuant sublingual, or submental or submandibular neck swelling with a bluish discolouration. These lesions consist of a mucus accumulation within the connective tissue without any epithelial lining. The duration of clinical symptoms is shorter in children and younger patients compared to adults. Large ranulas cause medial and superior displacement of tongue.8 If left untreated, Ranula may cause trouble with speech, chewing, swallowing, and breathing. A large Ranula will suppress the salivary gland duct and cause the flow of saliva to be disrupted. Salivary gland obstruction can lead to pain when eating when the salivary gland is parasympathetically stimulated.

According to Harrison et al,9 Ranula can be caused by several mechanisms:

  1. Partial or complete obstruction of the excretory duct due to the occurrence of sialolith, congenital malformations, stenosis, periductal fibrosis, scarring around the canal, trauma, tissue formation in excretory ducts or tumors which causes inhibition of salivary flow. In turn, mucous comes out through a orifice or detachment in the mylohyoid muscle. Extravasation of the sublingual salivary gland plunging ranula.

  2. Continuous production of the saliva in the sublingual gland will accelerate mucous accumulation in the neck and cause expansion of the cervical region.

  3. • Rupture of the acini gland due to excessive pressure from a blocked duct is another mechanism which cause ranula.

  4. Trauma which damages the parenchymal cells of the salivary gland lobe.

According to a study by Y S Chung et al. various treatment modalities were used for treatment of oral ranulas such as: intraoral resection of the sub lingual gland, excision of the ranula alone, marsupialisation and its modifications, micro marsupialization and its modifications, and injection of sclerosing agent- OK-432. Micro marsupialisation and its modifications included all types of suture-based techniques that did not remove the overlying mucosa of the ranula. The removal of the overlying mucosa of the ranula, regardless of whether there is any additional treatment, was categorised as marsupialisation and its modifications.Sclerosing injection included all techniques that used drugs to promote inflammation and sclerosis. The study revealed that the cure rate of intraoral resection of the sublingual gland along with the ranula is the highest and it was significantly better than excision of ranula alone. 10

According to literature, the reported recurrence rates after various treatment modalities are: incision and drainage (70% to 100%), marsupialisation (36.4% to 80%), excision of ranula only (18.7% to 85%), and excision of ranula along with sublingual salivary gland (0% to3.8%). 11, 12

Complications

Transient or permanent nerve injuries, formation of a haematogenous reaction, infection or sialadenitis, and dehiscence or injury to the Wharton's duct are some of the complications that can occur during surgical excision of ranula. 10

Conclusion

Ranulas are extravasation cysts with majority of them arising from sublingual gland. There are various treatment modalities available, however resection of the sub lingual gland along with excision of the lesion is the best and most reliable surgical treatment for oral ranula with least incidence of recurrence.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

MG Choi Case report of the management of the ranulaJ Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg201945635763

2 

K Zhi L Gao W Ren What is new in management of pediatric ranulaCurr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg20142265259

3 

J X Chen J Zenga K Emerick D Deschler Sublingual gland excision for the surgical management of plunging ranulaAm J Otolaryngol2018395497500

4 

M Gontarz J Bargiel K Gąsiorowski T Marecik P Szczurowski J Zapała Surgical Treatment of Sublingual Gland RanulasInt Arch Otorhinolaryngol2022272e296e301

5 

MR Patel AM Deal WW Shockley Oral and plunging ranulas: What is the most effective treatment?Laryngoscope2009119815019

6 

O Ali I Yasin KA Khan Ranula-Recommended Radiology and ManagementInt J Sci Res20187314725

7 

T Takimoto Radiographic technique for preoperative diagnosis of plunging ranulaJ Oral Maxillofac Surg199149665910.1016/0278-2391(91)90353-n

8 

SK Swain D Dubey Ranula: A narrative reviewInt J Res Med Sci202311141722

9 

J D Harrison Modern management and pathophysiology of ranula: literature reviewHead & neck2010321013101320

10 

YS Chung Y Cho BH Kim Comparison of outcomes of treatment for ranula: a proportion meta-analysisBr J Oral Maxillofac Surg20195776206

11 

D Ghassan A Yasser Ranula and the sublingual salivary glands review of 32 casesBahrain Med Bull1998201https://www.bahrainmedicalbulletin.com/march_1998/RANULA.pdf

12 

D Parekh M Stewart C Joseph HH Lawson Plunging ranula: a report of three cases and review of the literatureBr J Surg19877443079



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Case Report


Article page

136-139


Authors Details

Priyam Mitra*, Denis Jacob Kurian


Article History

Received : 12-11-2023

Accepted : 04-12-2023


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files